Is it just me, or have SCSUScholars' ads been a little ... spicy ... lately? I mean, for the last few days there was that "Do cops give girls enough speeding tickets?" (I'm paraphrasing here) ad, and the accompanying pic was a drawing of some sexy lace-draped girl who you just KNOW never gets a ticket. Today the ad is "Should inmates have girly magazines?", and (just in case we forgot what girly magazines contain) has a drawing of another girl in her underwear.

As pictures go, these aren't particularly salacious; they're more like pictures of drawings of an artist's conception of what a sexy-ish woman could possibly look like, if she happened to be wearing lingerie. And I'm not the sort of person who has fits of the moral vapors and has to be revived with smelling salts everytime I see someone who is, shall we say, particularly at risk of sunburn. I'm not offended, and I'm not really trying to suggest that Something Be Done About This.

I guess I'm really just amused that those pictures are showing up in the box labelled "Scholarly stuff!"

I've gone ahead and enabled comments for this post ;) so feel free to tell us all what you think about spicy pictures on SCSUScholars! I'll be sure to pass you suggestions on to Prof. Banaian. :)